Skip to main content

Do we wait for perfect people?


 Do we wait for perfect people?

There are not now, nor have there ever been, perfect people, except one, and if you believe that story, we crucified him! Is perfection attainable? Human history and daily practice say no. Should we let that stand in the way of progress? 


A historian I trust said that one of our founders was a horrible man. I have no argument against that theory. The question then: “Is the product of his intellect invalid?" If the product of the minds of our founders is deemed incorrect and inoperable because they were severely flawed men, we also have no right to take on the trials of our own day! We are as flawed as they, in ways we can not yet grasp!


Do we wait for perfect documents?


Our founders were flawed, as we have noted. We live and work in a system they created. Is that system inherently wrong as a result? Shall we wait for perfect people to produce perfect governing documents? If so, we would not to this day have attended the greatest evil of their time or ours!

Had we waited until the present to begin this noblest of human tasks, we would be 250 years further from reaching it today! 


With all our imperfections, we who live today risk the greatest prodigality if we do not act! The Declaration, the revolution, and the Constitution may be flawed, but they created a template for more change. They did not abolish the great sin of the day, but built the siege works for its future destruction. They did this, but not without making numerous mistakes and implementing changes along the way. 


We are still striving today, and the process, the work, will never be perfectly completed! The “pursuit” of happiness is our goal, not happiness as an end in itself. We have never finished. We are always stretching toward a more perfect union.


Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good!


The founders flounder in their own ideas. They conflict with themselves, not just among each other but inside their own heads! Yet they made progress. We, ourselves, are a magnificent mess, but there is something higher and more noble in our messy ideals. We must strive toward perfection, though we know we will never completely attain it. Imperfection should not prevent us from moving forward. Don't let the perfect prevent us from progress.


 "Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien" Voltaire

Popular posts from this blog

Trump Win Fueled By Whimpering Democrats!

That is the headline I expect to see post-election  It's too early to see the full effect of the debate, but the most morose of the Commentary I have seen came from Democrats early after the event. It was that on which the pundit class based its commentary!  It seems the only way media on either side of politics comments is Democratic self-loathing! The first ten things I read from the right this morning were the whimpering comments from the left about how they lost and needed to change course! Their self-deprecating made it as bad as they perceived!  Tragically the debate was bad but not as bad as the dems made it out to be. It was one tiny data point in the face of a megalomaniacal cartoon-style villain, a felon with 34 felonies and multiple remaining felony indictments who incited an election overthrow to dispossess the votes of 81 million voters!
Read more

Problems for Federalism if States Can't Determine Eligibility

If the court rules that individual states can not determine eligibility the door would be open to all third parties for ballot access challenges. The court would have to set up or help to establish federal rules to determine eligibility requirements or face a flood of challenges for all 50 states. That seems to be a nail in the coffin of Federalism. A Trump victory in SCOTUS would set up a 50 state rush of indie candidates who would take eligibility questions to the high court. To avoid that they would have to legislate from the bench or convince Congress to legislate an end to Federalism!
Read more

Preliminary findings after reading the Durham report

  After reading the report: 1. Did not exonerate Trump. 1. Did not exonerate Trump. 2. Made no suggestion for criminal charges beyond the ones made in an earlier iteration and noted below. 3. Durham found no reason for opening a full investigation into Trump/Russian collaboration at that time. 4. Suggested that the FBI should have opened a preliminary investigation. The implication being that a preliminary investigation would have led to a full investigation. 5. Durham said that it was possible that the FBI needed to put some reforms in place. In addition, the investigation as a whole did see an earlier iteration that made 3 criminal charges: One plead guilty, the 2 others were tried and acquitted. I am awaiting the Durham appearance before congress to do a full report. I have an inescapable sense that there is something else going on here. Similarities between this report and the Müller report like something is being left out of the story by both. Somewhere in my reading, I ran ac...
Read more