Skip to main content

Jobs, Inflation, Industrial Policy and Immigration

 We don't have workers to fill all the available jobs in the United states. 

Some politicians on both sides want to use big government to bring jobs back from other countries. 

Anyone see an issue here? There are actually several.

First, perhaps, we should allow workers from other countries in to fill the jobs we have. 

This would accomplish a lot more than we see at the surface level.  It would solve the immigration issue and the inflation issue for starters. 

First immigration and labor: A lot of folks are trying to get into the country for work, and a lot of jobs are looking for workers. What a great opportunity to solve both problems at the same time!

Second, inflation: we have inflation for the same reason we always have inflation. There are too many dollars chasing too few goods. That is the classic definition of inflation. The Fed answer to inflation is to slow down the money by increasing interest rates. Wouldn't it be much smarter to increase the number of goods? Increasing the workforce would do just that.

As for industrial policy: Increasing the number of jobs in a place where we already have more jobs than workers would raise wages, but also raise the price of goods. That is inflationary by nature. Industrial policy increases taxes because it is our money they are using to draw the jobs by subsidizing factories. It results in higher prices in other ways such as punitive tariffs which the end user always pays. 

We have some complex problems with very simple answers which we could solve in a matter of months, if not weeks if our leaders would do what they already know is right!

Popular posts from this blog

Trump Win Fueled By Whimpering Democrats!

That is the headline I expect to see post-election  It's too early to see the full effect of the debate, but the most morose of the Commentary I have seen came from Democrats early after the event. It was that on which the pundit class based its commentary!  It seems the only way media on either side of politics comments is Democratic self-loathing! The first ten things I read from the right this morning were the whimpering comments from the left about how they lost and needed to change course! Their self-deprecating made it as bad as they perceived!  Tragically the debate was bad but not as bad as the dems made it out to be. It was one tiny data point in the face of a megalomaniacal cartoon-style villain, a felon with 34 felonies and multiple remaining felony indictments who incited an election overthrow to dispossess the votes of 81 million voters!

Trump Major Failures!

Ending TPP  Ending JCPOA Ending NAFTA  Ending Affiliation with WTO    TPP  The Trans-Pacific Partnership, which Trump obviously did not understand was the biggest boon to China in this century! Under the agreement, we would have an economic and democracy-boosting agreement with the Pacific Rim nations that would have rivaled China and provided security and economic and military leverage against them!  JCPOA  The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action was intended to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons and improve regional and global security. Iran accepted restrictions on its nuclear program and underwent regular inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Our removal from the program resulted in our blindness to the Iranian nuclear progress, which is now just short of weapons production!  NAFTA  The North American Free Trade Agreement was ended by the Trump administration and the new agreement brokered by them led to higher U...

Problems for Federalism if States Can't Determine Eligibility

If the court rules that individual states can not determine eligibility the door would be open to all third parties for ballot access challenges. The court would have to set up or help to establish federal rules to determine eligibility requirements or face a flood of challenges for all 50 states. That seems to be a nail in the coffin of Federalism. A Trump victory in SCOTUS would set up a 50 state rush of indie candidates who would take eligibility questions to the high court. To avoid that they would have to legislate from the bench or convince Congress to legislate an end to Federalism!